Favorite Blog Post

My favorite blog post for the semester is titled "the data cycle", posted on May 17th, 2010. I would say this is exemplary of the progress I have made blogging this year because it displays several important things that are important to blogging in our class: making connections between material and discussions and analyzing texts. I, in this post made the connection that I saw between the Kentucky Cycle we were reading in class and the topic of Mr. Bolos' blog post a few days before. I made this connection which I believe shows that I am thinking critically about the things I see and hear. I also used textual examples in my post, which I think is very important. One of the main things I took away from AIS this year is that if you want to make a claim, you have to bring evidence. And in the case of my blog I did just that. I think that over the course of the year, my focus in blogging has shifted. I began blogging about pretty arbitrary topics that I found interesting personally, and finished by writing posts that thought critically about our class. All in all the blogging experience was pretty unique, and I enjoyed it a lot. I'm looking forward to weighing in on a few discussions next year on the Am Stud Blog!

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

The Rights of a Petitioner

We were asked to blog about a specific right that petitioners should or should not be afforded. The right in question is that of the publication of the results of certain petitions, should peoples names be shared with the public along with their vote. The issue that was briefly discussed was that of Gay Rights. The specific example that was provided was :if somebody voted against gay rights, should that vote be made public?
My answer to this question is yes. First of all, if anyone is so adament about an issue that they wish to voice their opinion via petition, then they should be prepared to defend themselves (verbally of course!). I answer yes mostly because people should be proud of their political standpoints, ridiculous or not. If someone were to argue in the other direction they would be arguing that it is an invasion of their privacy for their vote to be made public. But I see it in the completely opposite way, if somone were to go out of their way to voice their opinion then everyone should have the right to know. The truth is that anyone that would vote in favor of keeping petitions private is most likely a coward, trying to avoid conflict but at the same time prohibiting people from living their lives with a single signature.
It is hard for me to clearly say what I am thinking in this post because the sheer thought of anyone arguing against gay marriage aggravates me beyond comprehension. The point I am really trying to make is, if you want to prohibit people from living the way they want by way of petition, you gotta man up and stick to your guns.

No comments:

Post a Comment